Murry and Strasser

2.  Donald Murry says an autobiography is all of which contain traces of their creators. There is autobiographical language. He also says that all writings, in different ways, is autobiographical. Autobiography’s are set down into our past. Autobiography is not always detailed or it does not have to be. Some autobiography’s do not have to be the truth. An autobiography can be just what you think about life itself.

5. My mindset would be a lot different then it is now. I would definitely have a bigger mindset about how the way I would write an autobiography. In some ways it would have an affect on the way I write, but it would not be a lot.

6. My last paper I just wrote would be consider an autobiography. I wrote about my life in school. I wrote about myself, it was basically about my childhood.

1. You must learn how to write good and be very good at it. I do agree with this. People can say they are a good persuasive writer, but are they really? You must prove to people you are by writing a well educated persuasive paper. You must practice by writing different types of papers on which the subject is what you really do not want to write about.

2. People have their own opinions. Strasser must clearly see something can change. If you decide to write about whatever you want, it could lead to pointless writing and the reader will get very bored and will not want to read anymore of the writing. It would also teach pointless papers for people to write about. Nobody wants to write a pointless paper that they actually took time to do.

3. Going to school can change a persons. The way they see things; they start to see things a lot differently. It can definitely change someone’s spirit. A person could be happy and joyful, then the next thing you know they are sad and depress. That will make a person write a paper totally different then the would at first. Now body, I have no idea. I mean, I guess it could in way, I just do not have a reason for it.